{"id":2645,"date":"2026-10-04T12:03:45","date_gmt":"2026-10-04T12:03:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/digimanmarketing.com\/blog\/?p=2645"},"modified":"2026-10-04T12:03:45","modified_gmt":"2026-10-04T12:03:45","slug":"chennai-google-ads-management-fees-dataset","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/digimanmarketing.com\/blog\/chennai-google-ads-management-fees-dataset\/","title":{"rendered":"Chennai Google Ads Management Fees: A Dataset of Publicly Listed Packages"},"content":{"rendered":"

This dated sample records publicly displayed Google Ads or PPC management offers from seven providers marketing services to Chennai.<\/strong> The listings use fixed fees, percentage models, ranges and different currencies. They do not support one reliable \u201caverage Chennai fee\u201d: scope, media budgets, setup charges and billing conditions differ.<\/p>\n

Research date:<\/strong> 4 October 2026. Unit:<\/strong> provider page, with selected package observations. Sample:<\/strong> seven providers. This is a convenience sample of retrievable public pages, not an exhaustive market survey, a provider ranking or a set of negotiated quotes. The publisher, Digiman Marketing, also offers marketing services; inclusion is not an endorsement.<\/p>\n

How the pricing dataset was collected<\/h2>\n

Discovery searches included \u201cChennai Google Ads management packages pricing monthly agency\u201d and \u201cChennai PPC packages management fee pricing.\u201d We followed first-party provider pages and extracted numerical management pricing where the retrieved page identified Chennai service coverage and Google Ads or PPC scope.<\/p>\n

The planned target was 8\u201312 qualifying providers. Seven records were retained after checking page evidence. We did not fill the sample with inferred prices. AdVeyro was omitted because repeat retrieval did not provide dependable pricing evidence; Growadz could not be retrieved. Frameleads\u2019 broader multi-channel programme bands were reviewed but excluded from the core Google Ads\/PPC package table because they represent a materially broader engagement.<\/p>\n

Duplicate city pages from one provider were not counted as additional agencies. Third-party directories, forum posts and general market estimates were not used as provider offers. Search snippets were discovery aids; the table uses retrieved page details. Prices remain provider statements and were not confirmed by contacting sales or completing checkout.<\/p>\n

Publicly listed Google Ads management packages serving Chennai<\/h2>\n

All records were observed through retrieved provider pages on 4 October 2026; some retrievals may use previously crawled content. The date records research access, not proof of a provider\u2019s last revision. INR is shown with \u20b9; US dollars remain in their original currency. Tax treatment is not assumed. \u201cNot itemized\u201d means the inspected section did not separately resolve the field\u2014it does not mean free.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Provider and source<\/th>\nDisplayed fee<\/th>\nModel \/ conditions<\/th>\nSetup<\/th>\nScope and comparison notes<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
NaviGo<\/a><\/td>\nStarter PPC: \u20b910,000\/month<\/td>\nFixed; ad spend additional<\/td>\nSeparate setup charge not itemized in the PPC card<\/td>\nGoogle Ads setup, two campaigns and monthly reporting; spend cap and detailed exclusions require confirmation.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Nikitha<\/a><\/td>\nBusiness: \u20b915,000\/month<\/td>\nFixed up to \u20b91,50,000 monthly ad budget; above that, 10% of total spend<\/td>\nSeparate setup charge not itemized<\/td>\nOne campaign; tracking and basic landing-page optimization listed. Page states minimum media budget \u20b915,000\/month.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7 Stones Digital<\/a><\/td>\nStarter: \u20b922,750 monthly management; Business: 14%; Enterprise: 12%<\/td>\n\u20b922,750 shown as minimum for all plans<\/td>\nStarter \u20b970,000; Business \u20b91,22,500; Enterprise \u20b91,75,000<\/td>\nStarter network spend listed \u20b91,50,000; creative and translation charges separately listed. Confirm current eligibility and terms.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ZielDigital<\/a><\/td>\nBasic \u20b929,999\/month; Growth \u20b959,999\/month<\/td>\nEnterprise: higher of 10% of spend or \u20b91,49,999\/month<\/td>\n\u20b932,999 one-time setup<\/td>\nBasic positioned for spend up to \u20b91.25 lakh; media additional. Landing-page review differs from a new build.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
DigeHub<\/a><\/td>\nStarter \u20b915,000\u2013\u20b930,000\/month<\/td>\nRange; Growth card \u20b940,000\u2013\u20b980,000\/month plus 10\u201315% of spend<\/td>\nNot itemized in retrieved pricing section<\/td>\nStarter: one Search campaign, tracking and monthly report; minimum media \u20b925,000. Clarify the Growth formula in writing.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cloud 9 Digital<\/a><\/td>\nStarter \u20b925,000; Growth \u20b940,000; Enterprise \u20b960,000 per month<\/td>\nFixed package cards; media additional<\/td>\nNot itemized in retrieved pricing section<\/td>\nStarter media \u20b950,000\u2013\u20b91,00,000. Same page also states a typical management range \u20b930,000\u2013\u20b91,00,000; request reconciliation.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SEOAD<\/a><\/td>\nStarter US$250; Growth US$450; Pro US$900 per month<\/td>\nUSD display; not converted to INR<\/td>\nPage explicitly states no setup fee<\/td>\nStarter spend cap US$2,500\/month; Growth US$10,000. INR selector exists but no verified selected INR tariff captured.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

The row order is not a quality ranking. Higher-tier entries are included only where they explain a provider\u2019s fee structure; this is not a complete transcription of every plan and feature.<\/p>\n

Compare fee groups before comparing numbers<\/h2>\n

Fixed INR package cards<\/h3>\n

NaviGo, Nikitha, ZielDigital and Cloud 9 Digital show fixed INR package figures in the selected observations. That makes the amounts readable, but not interchangeable. Campaign allowance, media-spend conditions, setup work and ongoing deliverables still differ. Nikitha\u2019s fee changes to a percentage above its stated threshold.<\/p>\n

Ranges and percentage-based models<\/h3>\n

DigeHub\u2019s Starter listing is a range rather than a single quote. Its Growth card adds a percentage term; ask how the complete charge is calculated. ZielDigital\u2019s Enterprise plan uses a minimum-versus-percentage formula. 7 Stones Digital lists percentage tiers with a minimum management cost. Do not replace these models with their lowest visible number.<\/p>\n

USD pricing<\/h3>\n

SEOAD\u2019s retrieved pricing display uses US dollars. We have not invented an INR conversion or assumed the INR selector would produce an exchange-rate equivalent. Request a current INR quote and confirm billing, taxes and payment conditions before comparing it with rupee offers.<\/p>\n

Setup charges change the first-month comparison<\/h2>\n

Recurring fees are only one component. ZielDigital\u2019s selected Basic listing identifies \u20b929,999\/month plus \u20b932,999 setup. Adding those two displayed items gives \u20b962,998 before media spend and any applicable taxes or other charges. This is an arithmetic illustration based on the listing, not an invoice or a complete launch budget.<\/p>\n

7 Stones Digital also separately displays setup amounts. SEOAD explicitly states no setup fee on its displayed plans. For the other rows, lack of a separate setup line in the inspected pricing section should prompt a question rather than an assumption of zero.<\/p>\n

Use our Google Ads management fees guide<\/a> to distinguish recurring agency charges, media spend, one-off work and additional assets. This dataset records public observations; that guide explains how to interpret a received quote.<\/p>\n

Scope differences that matter to the buyer<\/h2>\n